Argues that OMRDD's decision to deny employment violated Article 23-A of New York State's Correction Law, that his conviction had no "direct relationship" to the job, that Petitioner's employment would not pose unreasonable risk to property or safety, that OMRDD's decision to deny employment violated New York State and New York City Human Rights Laws, and New York State Executive Law § 845-b, and that the denial was arbitrary and caprious, and constituted an abuse of discretion.