skip to content

Reentry Resource Center - New York

Serving People from Arrest to Reintegration

View by: Folder | Topic
Folder: Main Menu > Public Benefits & Welfare > Fleeing Felon Laws > State Fair Hearings & Regulations

New York State Fair Hearings related to "fleeing felon" eligibility for public benefits. Eligibility limitations for "fleeing felons" for TANF and other state benefits derive from the same legal source as federal SSI/SSDI limitations. In state advocacy, it is important that one uses decisions from the SSA context, such as Fowlkes.

ยป These Fair Hearings were catalogued as part of the extensive database of Fair Hearings Decisions in the Online Resource Center maintained by the Empire Justice Center and Western New York Law Center.

Resources

Download Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader

  • Fair Hearing # BA0371898: Was the determination of the Monroe County Department of Social Services that the appellant is ineligible for Public Assistance and Food Stamp benefits because he is fleeing to avoid prosecution or custody or conviction for a felony correct?

  • Fair Hearing 4366001J: Was the determination of the Agency that the Appellant is ineligible for Public Assistance and Food Stamp benefits because such individual has been found by the Agency to be fleeing to avoid prosecution or custody or conviction for a felony correct?

  • Fair Hearing 3708876N: Was the Agency's determination not to include Appellant as part of the Appellant's Food Stamp household correct?

  • Fair Hearing 3737787Q: Was the Determination of the Agency to Discontinue the appellant's Public Assistance grant and Medical Assistance grant due to a failure of the appellant to complete an out-patient rehabilitation program for alcohol and substance abuse correct?

  • Fair Hearing 3561826L: Was the Determination of the Agency that the appellant is ineligible for Public Assistance and Food Stamp benefits because she was fleeing to avoid prosecution or custody or conviction for a felony correct?

  • Fair Hearing 3767336Z: Was the Determination of the Agency that the appellant is ineligible for Public Assistance, Medical Assistance and Food Stamp benefits because such individual is fleeing to avoid prosecution or custody or confinement after conviction or who is violating a condition or probation or parole correct?

  • OTDA 97 ADM-23 - State "Fleeing Felon/ Probation/Parole Violation" Policies

  • Fair Hearing 3745731H: Was the Agency's Determination to discontinue the appellants Public Assistance and Food Stamps on the grounds that she is in violation of an order of protection correct?

  • Fair Hearing 4012187K: Was the Agency's determination that the Appellant's household received an overissuance of food stamps because a household member (JT) had been ineligible for participation in the Food Stamp Program during June 2003 due to his "fleeing felon" status correct?

Login
Pro Bono and legal aid attorney resources - Pro Bono Net